Right-weighted source mix
1 of 1 source reviewed
+75
Reviewed source ratings are weighted by confidence. Unrated sources stay visible but do not affect the score.
✓
Left
Center
Right
1 reviewed
0 unrated
1 source
Bold News detected high framing pressure from negative comparison and decision pressure around Setback, setback, disaster, which could steer readers toward a favorable or unfavorable comparison of the actors.
negative comparison
4
decision pressure
3
loaded language
2
negative adjective/framing cues
1
Article weight system
100/100
Overview: This article shows strong signs of one-sided framing with high negative language and a right-weighted source mix.
Source mix
Right-weighted source mix
L
R
+75
bias
Framing pressure
High framing pressure
High
11 cues
Negative cues
Top negative framing cues detected
manipulated
1
cues
Timeline cue
No title/timeline wording cue detected
No role wording issue flagged.
Source perspective / framing notes
National Review
Right +75
100/100 source weight
How we got here
Methodology & scoring breakdown
6 steps
audit trail
View full methodology
Collect attached source records, extracted paragraphs, article text, source ratings, named entities, and framing signals. Source mix starts with 1 reviewed of 1 attached source; reviewed feed scores are confidence-weighted on the -100 to +100 scale. Framing pressure is 100/100 from 11 detected cues: loaded terms, negative adjectives, timeline/title wording, uncertainty, causal claims, opinion markers, and source perspective. Negative adjective/framing count is 1, scanning source titles, summaries, extracted paragraphs, and the generated article for terms such as manipulated. Timeline/title wording did not add pressure for this article. Named entities and article tags identify relevance; they help attach cues to people, places, organizations, and topics, but they do not create the bias score by themselves.
Loading comments.