Parents considering private schools often encounter polished marketing materials but limited information on potential issues such as leadership controversies, lawsuits, or financial instability that could disrupt schooling.

A ProPublica investigation published on July 16, 2026, reveals that many states adopt a hands-off approach to private school oversight, leaving families responsible for uncovering problems themselves. This contrasts with public schools, which are subject to more rigorous safety and quality checks.

The report cites examples including a private school in Arkansas still operating despite its founder being accused of running a "makeshift 'Fight Club.'" The school's new education director stated the founder is no longer involved in operations. Additionally, a former superintendent fired for mismanaging charter school funds in the Midwest was able to receive public funding for a private school in Florida.

Advocates for public funding of private schools argue that the primary accountability mechanism is parental choice, allowing families to leave unsatisfactory schools. However, ProPublica notes that marketing materials rarely disclose negative information such as principals with concerning histories, lawsuits filed by families, or financial instability that could lead to school closures mid-year.

The investigation also advises parents to verify accreditation status directly with schools, as not all private schools are accredited and accrediting agencies vary in rigor. Some schools may not appear in state directories or register independently if they operate under larger organizations like churches.

ProPublica previously reported in 2024 on a private school founder whose prior charter school had its charter revoked, underscoring ongoing concerns about oversight.

Sources