On Tuesday, July 21st, 2026, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously ruled that warrantless searches of privately marked land violate the state's constitution. The seven justices declared that the "open fields" doctrine—a broad exception to the Fourth Amendment first announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1924—does not apply under Pennsylvania's constitutional privacy protections.

The case involved the Punxsutawney Hunting Club and the Pitch Pine Hunting Club, which own 4,400 and 1,100 acres respectively in Clearfield County, Pennsylvania. Since 2013, Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) officers, including Warden Mark Gritzer, had entered these lands without consent, a warrant, or probable cause between 15 and 22 times to search for evidence of hunting violations. Gritzer also placed a trail camera on Punxsutawney's property for 78 days to gather probable cause for illegal elk feeding charges.

The court emphasized that unlike the Fourth Amendment, Pennsylvania's Article I, Section 8 explicitly protects "possessions," which the court interpreted to include land. Justice Kevin Brobson concluded that sections of the Pennsylvania Game and Wildlife Code permitting such warrantless entries violate the state constitution. Law enforcement must now obtain a warrant based on probable cause or meet recognized exceptions before entering private property where a reasonable expectation of privacy has been demonstrated.

Joshua Windham, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice representing the hunting clubs, stated, "The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed that private land is not public property."

This ruling marks a significant departure from federal precedent, reinforcing stronger privacy rights for Pennsylvania landowners.

Sources