The U.S. Defense Department is contemplating a significant restructuring of military higher education, including abolishing civilian tenure and conducting a detailed review of course offerings at military service academies and senior war colleges, according to an unreleased draft memorandum obtained by CBS News.

The draft, titled "Refocusing the Military Service Academies and Senior Service College on Warfighter Education," directs institutions such as the U.S. Military Academy at West Point to end the practice of granting tenure to civilian faculty. It also calls for a comprehensive evaluation of all curricula to determine whether courses directly advance the mission of educating future military officers.

Tenure, traditionally defended by academy leaders as essential for attracting qualified scholars, is described in the memo as a construct that often leads to "stagnation, complacency, and inflexibility," and contributes to curricula drifting from warfighter education toward the research priorities of tenured academics.

The memorandum has not yet received approval from top Pentagon officials, and its timeline for finalization and implementation remains unclear. U.S. military officials, speaking anonymously to CBS News, identified Tim Dill, assistant defense secretary for manpower and reserve affairs, as the driving force behind the proposal.

This initiative follows a 60-day review of military education and training standards ordered after When Hegseth convened generals and admirals in Quantico, Virginia, last year, emphasizing a Pentagon-wide reassessment of professional military education.

Additionally, the draft proposal emerges after West Point chose not to appeal a federal judge's temporary suspension of a policy requiring civilian faculty to seek advance approval before engaging in various forms of public speech, including publishing opinion pieces and interviews, as reported by The Washington Post.

A 2005 West Point faculty manual states that civilian faculty can be terminated for misconduct, financial exigency, or substantial program modifications, and appointments can only be declined for adequate cause.

Sources