Washington — On Thursday, August 7th, 2026, President Trump signed two executive orders in a renewed effort to deny citizenship to certain children born in the United States. This move comes after the Supreme Court struck down his earlier executive order that sought to end birthright citizenship.

One of the new orders targets individuals involved in commercial "birth tourism," aiming to deny them access to the country. The other order broadens the categories of people deemed ineligible for birthright citizenship, including children of foreign citizens who lobby on behalf of foreign governments.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller described birth tourism as a longstanding issue, stating, "This has been something that people have talked about, not only for years, but for decades." He elaborated, "The idea that people come here pretending to be a tourist, pretending to be a visitor, saying they want to go to Disneyland or they want to go visit a monument or go to a national park, but the real reason they're here is to have a child, to make that child an automatic citizen, leave our country, and then have a U.S. citizen child."

One order specifies that children born to mothers who entered the U.S. through commercial transactions intended to ensure birthright citizenship should not be granted citizenship documents.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) responded critically. Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, said in a statement, "Any executive order that tries to rewrite birthright citizenship will meet the same fate as the last one."

During related legal discussions, Chief Justice John Roberts told U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer, "You do agree that that has no impact on the legal analysis before us." Sauer noted that birth tourism highlights negative effects of the current interpretation of the Citizenship Clause, adding, "We're in a new world now … where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who is a U.S. citizen."

President Trump described the Supreme Court decision as "very unfortunate" and indicated adjustments would be made in response.

Sources