BOLD.news story
Source snapshot Publisher wording captured Jul 24, 2026, 10:14 AM 2,076 normalized characters retained in this legacy snapshot; capture completeness was not recorded. Public display is limited to an excerpt.
BOLD.news versionRead the distilled report
politics

"There Is an Error in the Supreme Court's Analysis in Loper Bright."

The Supreme Court's Chevron decision did not cite the Administrative Procedure Act perhaps because it was not an APA case.

Reason reporting 21 sentences analyzed 2,073 captured characters

NRDC's holding that federal courts should defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions.

In Loper Bright, the Court concluded that Chevron deference was incompatible with the Administrative Procedure Act.

As Chief Jsutice Roberts explained, Section 706 of the APA provides "'the reviewing court'—not the agency whose action it reviews—is to 'decide all relevant questions of law' and 'interpret . . . statutory provisions.'"

The Chevron opinion made no effort to reconcile its holding with the language of the APA.

BOLD.news retains normalized extraction for time-stamped evidence and analysis. This public wrapper shows a limited excerpt because availability is not a republication license; use the publisher link for the complete presentation.